Hooper v. Jamison et al

Filing 55

ORDER directing the Clerk to forward the document received from plaintiff objecting to certain orders and filings in this case back to plaintiff without filing it. Plaintiff is represented by counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 6/12/13. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION DANNY LEE HOOPER ADC #107609 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 2:12CV00048 SWW/HDY WESLEY JAMISON et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received from Plaintiff a document objecting to certain orders and filings in this case. Because Plaintiff is represented by counsel, the Clerk is directed to forward the document to Plaintiff without filing it.1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 12 day of June, 2013. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 Plaintiff’s document also requests that his appointed counsel be dismissed, and that Court appoint one of two attorneys suggested by Plaintiff. There is no reason for the Court to believe Plaintiff’s attorney should be dismissed. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed pro se, he may file a specific motion to dismiss his attorney. However, Plaintiff is not entitled to select a different attorney.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?