Hooper v. Jamison et al
ORDER directing the Clerk to forward the document received from plaintiff objecting to certain orders and filings in this case back to plaintiff without filing it. Plaintiff is represented by counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 6/12/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DANNY LEE HOOPER
NO: 2:12CV00048 SWW/HDY
WESLEY JAMISON et al.
The Court has received from Plaintiff a document objecting to certain orders and filings in
this case. Because Plaintiff is represented by counsel, the Clerk is directed to forward the document
to Plaintiff without filing it.1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12
day of June, 2013.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff’s document also requests that his appointed counsel be dismissed, and that Court
appoint one of two attorneys suggested by Plaintiff. There is no reason for the Court to believe
Plaintiff’s attorney should be dismissed. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed pro se, he may file a specific
motion to dismiss his attorney. However, Plaintiff is not entitled to select a different attorney.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?