Manfre v. USA et al
DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD. (dmn) (Docket text modified on 5/20/2013, per instructions from Chambers.) (thd).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
KEVIN GERARD MANFRE,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney.
After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety.
The Court notes that Plaintiff has not filed an Amended Complaint in this case as stated in
his objections. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges Defendant Matos violated his Eighth Amendment
right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Plaintiff has not plead any other causes of
action against Defendant Matos in this case. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant
Matos (Doc. No. 75) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims against this Defendant are DISMISSED
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of May, 2013.
JAMES M. MOODY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?