Chestang v. Robinson et al

Filing 14

ORDER re 12 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by KeOndra M Chestang. The Clerk is directed to change the style of the case to reflect the correct name of deft Steven Decoursey. The Clerk shall prepare summons for Decoursey, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the summons and complaint on Decoursey, at the sealed address provided, without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 5/3/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION KEONDRA M. CHESTANG ADC #134005 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 2:12CV00055 JLH/HDY R.A. ROBINSON et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff filed this complaint on March 27, 2012, and service was ordered. On May 2, 2012, the summons was returned unexecuted as to Defendant Decoursey (docket entry #12). Service had been attempted in the care of the Arkansas Department of Correction, but was returned because Decoursey is no longer employed there. However, Decoursey’s first name and last known address was provided and filed under seal. Accordingly, service will be attempted at that address. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk is directed to change the style of the case to reflect the correct name of Defendant Steven Decoursey. 2. Decoursey’s last known address shall not be made part of any public record. 3. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a summons for Decoursey, and the United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the summons and complaint (docket entry #2), and this order, on Decoursey, at the address provided under seal, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. 4. Upon re-issuance of the summons and complaint, the United States Marshal is hereby directed to send Plaintiff’s copy of process to the Clerk of the Court, who shall then remove the address prior to forwarding a copy to Plaintiff. 1 DATED this 3 day of May, 2012. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?