Weron v. Outlaw
Filing
6
ORDER directing the Clerk to serve a copy of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James Douglas Weron and this Order on the respondent and the U.S. Attorney by regular mail; the respondent will file an answer to the habeas petition within 21 days after service of the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 4/24/12. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HELENA DIVISION
JAMES DOUGLAS WERON
REG #41051-074
PETITIONER
2:12CV00063 DPM/HDY
TIMOTHY C. OUTLAW
Warden, FCI–Forrest City
RESPONDENT
ORDER
Petitioner James Douglas Weron has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and paid
the $5.00 filing fee.
The clerk will serve a copy of the petition, and this order, on the respondent and the United
States Attorney by regular mail.
The respondent will file an answer, motion or other response to the petition, in conformity
with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts, within
twenty-one (21) days after service of this petition, exclusive of the day of service.
The Court directs the respondent to include in the response the following documents or
information:
1.
The judgment of conviction;
2.
the docket sheet from the sentencing court evidencing the
history of the proceedings;
3.
any order or opinion from the Court of Appeals dismissing a
direct appeal by petitioner or affirming petitioner’s
conviction, or a citation to such order or opinion;
4.
any order of the district court dismissing a § 2255 motion to
vacate or § 2241 petition filed by petitioner; and
5.
any order or opinion from the Court of Appeals dismissing an
appeal by petitioner from the denial of § 2255 or §2241 relief
or affirming the denial of a §2255 motion or § 2241 petition,
or a citation to such order or opinion.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24
day of April, 2012.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?