Smith v. Correctional Medical Services et al

Filing 65

ORDER granting 45 Separate Defendant Kelley's Motion to stay discovery; denying 55 & 58 Plaintiff's Motions to Compel; denying as moot 57 Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw his Motion for Extension of Time; and denying 59 Plaintiff's Motion for Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/28/2013. (srw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION JOSEPH SMITH, ADC #127880 v. PLAINTIFF 2:12CV00071-JMM-JJV CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff, Joseph Smith, an inmate at the East Arkansas Regional Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction has filed a pro se Complaint (Doc. No. 2) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging the Defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Before the Court are several motions - Separate Defendant Wendy Kelley’s Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. No. 45), Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 55), Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 57), Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 58), Plaintiff’s Motion for Order (Doc. No. 59), and Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 63). Separate Defendant Wendy Kelley has filed a Motion to Stay her participation in discovery until the Court renders a ruling on her Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. No. 32.) In the interest of judicial economy and efficiency, the Motion is GRANTED. Separate Defendant Kelley is relieved from participating in discovery until the Court renders a ruling on her Motion to Dismiss. After careful consideration of Plaintiff’s Motions to Compel (Doc. Nos. 55 and 58), the Court finds they should be DENIED. Plaintiff must first confer with counsel for Defendants and request the information before filing a motion to compel. Plaintiff was already allowed extra time to file his Response to the Motion to Stay. His Motion to Withdraw his Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 57) is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff’s Motion for Order (Doc. No. 59) is DENIED. The Court sees no necessity to categorize exhibits already a part of the record. SO ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2013. JOE J. VOLPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?