Gilliam v. Barnes et al
ORDER ADOPTING 255 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge; granting 219 Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Allen, Barnes, Butler, Chapman, Cobb, Foreman, Hoskin, Lane, Lang, Smith and Warren. Mr. Gilliam's constitutional claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED, with prejudice. His state law tort claims are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/14/2014. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ALONZO GILLIAM, III
TONY BARNES, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) filed
by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the recommendation and the
timely objections filed by Mr. Gilliam, as well as a de novo review of the record, the
Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and
adopted in all respects.
Defendants Michael Allen, Tony Barnes, Levester Butler, Steven Chapman, Fidel
Cobb, Harrison Foreman, Ronnie Hoskin, Stephen lane, James Lang, Marion Smith, and
Antonio Warren’s motion for summary judgment (#219) is GRANTED. Mr. Gilliam’s
constitutional claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED, with prejudice. His state
law tort claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of January, 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?