Long v. Obi et al
ORDER finding as moot 5 Partial Report and Recommendations; granting 16 Motion to Amend/Correct; and directing the Clerk to file Document No. 16-1 as Long's Amended Complaint.. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/31/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MICHAEL LONG JR.
NWANNEM OKOYE OBI; GERALDINE
CAMPBELL; DEBRA HORTON; CHAROLETTE
GARDNER; BAGWELL; STRICKLAND;
KITTRELL; BRENDA MINOR; WENDY KELLEY;
LAU; and CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES INC.
InJ une, Magistrate Judge Beth Deere recommended that some of Long's
claims be dismissed. Document No. 5. Long moved to amend his complaint
to cure the deficiencies Judge Deere (correctly) identified. Document No. 16.
He has mostly done so. Long has dropped his untenable grievance-procedure
claim against Brenda Minor. He has discarded the Fourteenth Amendment
claim too. He proposes to keep the co-pay claim Judge Deere recommended
dismissing. According to Long, he was charged a $3 co-pay for Tylenol
despite a nurse's contrary instruction. But Judge Deere is right that the claim
does not reach constitutional dimensions. It is dismissed.
Otherwise Long's proposed amended complaint adds useful detail to
Long's original allegations. In the circumstances, the Court declines Judge
Deere's recommendation, Document No.5, as moot. Long's motion to amend,
Document No. 16, is granted; the Clerk is directed to file Document No. 16-1 as
Long's Amended Complaint.
But the Court must dismiss Long's new "supplemental claim,"
Document No. 16-1, at 21-24, without prejudice. Long cannot have exhausted
grievances on that claim before filing this lawsuit, because the alleged
conduct happened afterward. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). And his co-pay claim is
dismissed as noted above.
The Court notes that some pending motions duplicate other unresolved
motions. Long should focus on the quality and not the quantity of his filings.
If this excessive filing continues, the Court will consider corrective restrictions
on Long's filing privileges.
D.P. Marshall Jr. C/
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?