May v. Outlaw et al
ORDER ADOPTING 8 The proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing 2 Mr. May's Complaint; and, denying all pending motions as moot. Dismissal of Mr. May's complaint constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/7/2012. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LOREN W. MAY, SR.
CASE NO. 2:12CV00113 BSM/HDY
T.C. OUTLAW et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge H. David Young [Doc. No. 8] and the filed objections [Doc. No. 9] have
been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review
of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Mr. May’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice as frivolous.
Dismissal of Mr. May’s complaint constitutes a “strike” within the meaning
of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
All pending motions are denied as moot.
An appropriate judgment shall accompany this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of September 2012.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?