Craig v. Brinkley Arkansas, City of et al

Filing 33

ORDER granting 27 Motion to Compel. If he has not done so already, Michael Edwards is ordered to provide complete and full disclosures as required by Rule 26(a) on or before June 19, 2013. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/12/13. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
LAWANNA CRAIG
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 2:12CV00114 JLH

CITY OF BRINKLEY, ARKANSAS;
and MICHAEL EDWARDS, in his official
and individual capacities as Chief of
Brinkley Police Department

DEFENDANT
DEFENDANT/
COUNTER-CLAIMANT
ORDER

On May 13, 2013, Lawanna Craig moved to compel Rule 26(a) disclosures from Michael
Edwards. The motion stated that Michael Edwards had never provided initial disclosures as required
by Rule 26(a). No response to the motion has been filed. On May 31, 2013, the Court wrote the
lawyers and pointed out that no response to the motion had been filed. The court stated, “If the
motion has been resolved, please let me know. If the motion has not been resolved, I need
Mr. Edwards to file his response by next Friday.” No party filed any response to the Court’s letter.
The motion to compel is therefore GRANTED. Document #27. If he has not done so already,
Michael Edwards is ordered to provide complete and full disclosures as required by Rule 26(a) on
or before June 19, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of June, 2013.

J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE