Namer v. USA et al
ORDER ADOPTING 25 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, this habeas petition is DISMISSED; all pending motions are denied as moot 15 25 . Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/9/13. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DAVID I. NAMER
NO. 2:12CV00143 SWW-JTR
Interim Warden, FCI-Forrest City
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended
Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the
filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de
novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Judgment will be
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Petitioner’s habeas claim challenging his October 5, 2011 disciplinary
conviction is DISMISSED with prejudice, and his habeas claim challenging the
imposition and collection of restitution payments during his incarceration is
DISMISSED without prejudice;
This 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (docket
entries #2, #7) is DISMISSED; and
All pending motions1 are denied as moot.
DATED this 9th day of April, 2013.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Petitioner’s Motion for Discovery and Medical Examination (docket entry #15);
Petitioner’s Motion for Hearing (docket entry #21).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?