Morris v. Does

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING 41 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, defts' 24 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; pltf's complaint 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice; all pending motions are denied as moot 37 ; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/8/13. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION EUGENE MORRIS, REG #21068-009 v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:12CV00146 JLH-JJV MARK ALLEN; KATHLEEN ROWTON; MARK JANKOWSKI DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and the plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Document #24. 2. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Document #1. 3. All pending motions are denied as moot. 4. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 8th day of July, 2013. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?