Adams v. East Arkansas Regional Unit et al
ORDER approving and adopting 4 Recommended Disposition; dismissing Mr. Adams's claims without prejudice; denying as moot 6 Motion to Amend/Correct and 7 Motion for Trial; and, certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/5/2012. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ADC # 151828
No. 2:12-cv-00153 KGB
EAST ARKANSAS REGIONAL UNIT, et al.
The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from Magistrate
Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, Mr. Adams’s objections, as well
as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and
hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects.1
Mr. Adams’s claims are dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal will count as a “strike”
for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Mr. Adams’s pending motion to amend and motion for jury
trial (Dkt. Nos. 6 and 7) are denied as moot. In addition, the Court certifies that an in forma
pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and not taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 5th day of October, 2012.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
In his objection, Mr. Adams states that a reduction in his classification level “kep[t] him
from making parole . . . .” As Judge Deere correctly noted, Mr. Adams does not have a liberty
interest in a particular classification. He does not have a liberty interest in the possibility of
parole either. Persechini v. Callaway, 651 F.3d 802, 808 (8th Cir. 2011).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?