Green v. Hawkins et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 26 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, defts' 22 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; pltf's 25 Motion to Amend Complaint and 24 25 Motions to Appoint Counsel are DENIED. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/4/13. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION DWIGHT H. GREEN, REG. #27451-001, * * * * * * * * * Plaintiff, v. JARVIS HAWKINS, Case Manager, FCIForrest City; et al., Defendants. No. 2:12CV00166-SWW-JJV ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22), is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. No. 25) is denied. 3. Plaintiff’s Motions to Appoint Counsel (Doc. Nos. 24, 25) are denied. 4. All other pending Motions are DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED this 4th day of March, 2013. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?