Hastings v. May et al

Filing 65

ORDER ADOPTING 62 the proposed findings and recommendations; granting in part 56 defendants' motion for summary judgment; dismissing, with prejudice, plaintiff's allegations against defendants Barnes and Jones, and dismissing Barnes and Jones as defendants; dismissing, with prejudice, plaintiff's medical allegations against defendant Smith; and allowing plaintiff's failure to protect and retaliation claim against defendant Smith to remain pending. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/28/2013. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL HASTINGS
ADC #110772
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 2:12CV00200 BSM

BOBBY MAY, Sheriff, St.
Francis County, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge
Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed, along with plaintiff’s objections. After careful
consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is determined that the proposed
findings and recommendations should be, and hereby are, adopted in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 56] is granted in

2.

Plaintiff’s allegations against defendants Barnes and Jones are dismissed

part.

with prejudice, and Barnes and Jones are dismissed as defendants.
3.

Plaintiff’s medical allegations against defendant Smith are dismissed with

prejudice.
4.

Plaintiff’s failure to protect and retaliation claims against defendant Smith

remain pending.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October 2013.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE