Hastings v. Oxner et al
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING 81 Partial Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge; granting 63 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Sheriff Oxner and Captain Guynes; 66 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Clay, Barnes and Miles is granted in part and denied in part; The official capacity claims for monetary damages, deliberate indifference to medical needs claims, retaliation claims and verbal harassment claim are dismissed, and Defendant Miles is dismissed as a defendant. Summary judgment on the due process claims against Defendants Barnes and Clay is denied. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/10/2014. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL HASTINGS, ADC # 110772
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Plaintiff,
v.
JACKIE OXNER, Sheriff, Lee County;
et al.
Defendants.
No. 2:12CV00212-SWW-JJV
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the
Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 63) filed by Sheriff Oxner and Captain
Guynes is GRANTED and they are dismissed as defendants.
2.
The Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 66) filed by Defendants Clay, Barnes and
Miles is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
A.
The official capacity claims for monetary damages, deliberate indifference to medical
needs claims, retaliation claims, and verbal harassment claim are DISMISSED and Defendant Miles is
dismissed as a defendant.
B.
Summary judgment on the due process claim against Defendants Barnes and Clay
is DENIED.
SO ORDERED this 10th day of February, 2014.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?