Crawford v. Peikar et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 6 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, Michelle Wingo is added as a deft; the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons, complaints 2 5 , and this Order on defts Peikar, Graham, Hoy, McCay, Roberts, Heu ett, Outlaw, Gallardo, Brown, Ward, Resto, Rios, Maples, and Wingo, and the U.S. Attorney's Office and the U.S. Attorney General, without prepayment of fees and costs; all other claims and defts are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/3/13. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION JEFFERY L. CRAWFORD, Reg. #35243-044 V. PLAINTIFF 2:12CV00224 SWW/JTR NADER PEIKAR, Doctor, FCI-FC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. The Court further finds, based on plaintiff’s amended complaint, that Michelle Wingo, a member of the medical staff at FCI-FC, should be added as a defendant. It appears plaintiff alleges she was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs as to his spinal and nerve damage.1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. 1 Plaintiff may PROCEED with claim that Defendants Peikar, Graham, See Am. Comp. at 6; Objections at 4-5. Hoy, McCay, Roberts, Heuett, Outlaw, Gallardo, Brown, Ward, Resto, Rios, and Maples provided him with inadequate medical care for spinal and nerve damage. It is further ordered that Michelle Wingo be added as a defendant. 2. All other claims and Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Defendants Peikar, Graham, Hoy, McCay, Roberts, Heuett, Outlaw, Gallardo, Brown, Ward, Resto, Rios, Maples, and Wingo. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, Complaint, Amended Complaint, and this Order on them, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, and the United States Attorney General, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.2 4. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 3rd day of January, 2013. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 If any of the Defendants are no longer federal employees, the individual responding to service must file the unserved Defendant’s last known private mailing address under seal.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?