Crawford v. USA et al
Filing
15
ORDER DECLINING 8 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge: After reviewing the record, the Court finds that Plaintiff has paid the filing fee to initiate this proceeding. Because the Court has declined to adopt the Proposed Findings and Re commendations, Mr. Crawford's 10 motion for reconsideration and 14 motion for writ of mandamus are denied as moot. His 13 motion to appoint counsel remains pending. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge H. David Young for further proceedings consistent with this order. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/30/2013. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HELENA DIVISION
JEFFEERY LAMAR CRAWFORD
REG # 35243-044
v.
PETITIONER
Case No. 2:12CV00242 KGB-HDY
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 8). After reviewing the record de
novo, the Court finds that plaintiff Jeffery Lamar Crawford has paid the filing fee to initiate this
habeas corpus proceeding. Accordingly, the Court declines to adopt the Proposed Findings and
Recommendations (Dkt. No. 8). Because the Court has declined to adopt the Proposed Findings
and Recommendations, Mr. Crawford’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 10) and his petition
for a writ of mandamus (Dkt. No. 14) are denied as moot. Mr. Crawford’s motion to appoint
counsel remains pending (Dkt. No. 13). This matter is referred to Judge Young for further
proceedings consistent with this order.
SO ORDERED this the 30th day of May, 2013.
______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?