Forrest v. Collier et al
ORDER adopting 4 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; and dismissing 2 plaintiff Bobby L. Forrest's complaint for failure to state a claim. Dismissal of the action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Pri son Litigation Reform Act 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/16/2013. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
BOBBY L. FORREST
CASE NO. 2:13CV00046 BSM/JTK
JOHN COLLIER, Jail Administrator,
Cross County Sheriff Department et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney [Doc. No. 4] have been reviewed. No objections were
filed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the
record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be,
and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff Bobby L. Forrest’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] against defendants John
Collier, Tommy Hampton, Heath, and J.R. Smith is dismissed for failure to state a claim.
Dismissal of the action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), it is certified that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this order and judgment would not be taken in good faith.
An appropriate judgment shall accompany this order.
Dated this 16th day of May 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?