Bell v. Burl et al
ORDER denying 41 Plaintiff's Motion for a Subpoena which has been construed as a Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 01/30/2014. (kcs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JOE LEONARD BELL, JR.,
DANNY BURL, Warden; and
JEREMY ANDREWS, Major,
East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, et al.
Plaintiff has filed a “Motion to Subpoena,” which is more properly
characterized as a Motion to Compel. Doc. 41. In that pleading, Plaintiff asks the
Court to require Defendants to produce a paper copy of the medical script Nurse
Floyd entered into an electronic database on May 12, 2011. Id.
Defendants explain that their electronic database does not contain any such
medical script. Doc. 45. Instead, the electronic database demonstrates that Plaintiff
was seen in the infirmary by Nurse Campbell on April 23, 2011, and he did not return
to the infirmary until November 2, 2011. Id. The Court cannot order Defendants to
produce what they do not possess.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's Motion for a Subpoena,
which has been construed as a Motion to Compel (Doc. 41), is DENIED.
Dated this 30th day of January, 2014.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?