Bell v. Burl et al
Filing
99
ORDER dismissing Bell's remaining claim against Andrews without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The pending motions, 92 & 93 are denied as moot. Mr. Rosenzweig is relieved as counsel with the Court's thanks. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/18/2015. (jak)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
JOE LEONARD BELL, JR.
ADC #107834
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 2:13-cv-54-DPM
JEREMY ANDREWS, Major,
East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Despite the Court's Order, NQ 94, Bell didn't appear at the 18 November
2015 hearing. The Court will therefore dismiss Bell's remaining claim against
Andrews without prejudice for failure to prosecute. LOCAL RULE 5.5(c)(2).
The pending motions, NQ 92 & 93, are denied as moot. Mr. Rosenzweig is
relieved as counsel with the Court's thanks.
So Ordered.
ti'
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
