Lewis v. Green et al
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Partial Report and Recommendations; therefore, the Clerk is directed to correct name of deft Yarbrough; pltf's claims against deft ADC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the claims against deft Corizon Inc are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; pltf may proceed with his inadequate medical care claim against defts Green, Harris, Davis, Ball, Carlo, Strickland, Gardner, Hughes, Murry, Horton, Butler, and Yarbrough; the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons, complaint (pages 1 through 42), amended complaint, and this Order on these defts without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/20/13. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ARTHUR C. LEWIS, JR.,
No. 2:13CV00073 JLH/JTR
CHARLOTTE GREEN, Registered Nurse,
East Arkansas Regional Unit, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully
considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby
are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
The Clerk is directed to amend the docket sheet to reflect that defendant Yarbo’s last
name is “Yarbrough.”
Plaintiff’s claims against defendant ADC are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Corizon, Inc. are DISMISSED, WITHOUT
Plaintiff may PROCEED with his inadequate medical care claim against defendants
Green, Harris, Davis, Ball, Carlo, Strickland, Gardner, Hughes, Murry, Horton, Butler, and
Yarbrough. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for those twelve defendants, and the United
States Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint (pages 1 through 42),1 amended
The complaint is forty-two pages long and includes an additional eighty-five pages of
grievance forms. Due to the length of the complaint and the number of defendants, the Court will
complaint, and this Order on them through the Humphries law firm without prepayment of fees and
costs or security therefor.2
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 20th day of September, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
only serve the first forty-two pages. Counsel for defendants may obtain a full copy of the complaint
and its numerous attachments from CM/ECF or by calling the Court.
If any of the defendants are no longer Corizon, Inc., employees, the Humphries law firm
must file, with the return of unexecuted service, a SEALED statement providing the last known
private mailing address for the unserved defendant.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?