Pena v. Sutton et al
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; therefore, deft Wesner is DISMISSED and Sutton must remain as a deft; the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons, complaint and this Order on deft Sutton without prepayment of fees and costs; CASE REFERRED BACK to Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/4/13. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
AARON MOSES PENA
CASE NO. 2:13CV00075 BSM
J. SUTTON et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the proposed findings and recommended disposition are adopted
in part and rejected in part. The findings as to defendant Wesner are adopted in their
entirety. As to defendant Sutton, Pena alleges Sutton was deliberately indifferent when he
failed to take Pena to the infirmary to treat “six lacerations” on Pena’s head. Pena has stated
a claim upon which relief may be granted, and Sutton must remain as a defendant at this
Accordingly, Wesner is dismissed. The clerk of court is directed to prepare summons
for Sutton and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint [Doc. No. 2], this
order, and summons on Sutton, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of October 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?