Onstad v. Hobbs et al
ORDER adopting 131 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's 69 motion for summary judgment and 105 motion to compel are denied. Defendants' 99 motion for partial summary judgment and 116 122 motions for summary judgment are granted. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 5/27/2014. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ALAN COLE ONSTAD
NO: 2:13CV00080 SWW
RAY HOBBS et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the relevant record in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended
Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings
in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (docket entry #69) is DENIED.
Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (docket entry #99), and their
motions for summary judgment (docket entries #116 & #122) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s
complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff’s motion to compel (docket entry #105) is DENIED.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 27th day of May, 2014.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?