Covington v. Wallace
ORDER denying 29 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice; denying 26 Motion to sever without prejudice; and granting 18 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter a default against Acosta. Damages will be fixed at the trial. The Court dismisses the claims against defendant Woodward without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/20/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
GARY COVINGTON; BETHANY WALKER;
GARY ANDERSON; BELINDA WALKER; and
ULESS WALLACE, DALE ACOSTA, TRAVIS
WALLACE, HERMAN HALL, and HOWARD
WOODWARD, all individually and in their
official capacities, and HELENA REGIONAL
1. Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Uless Wallace, Travis Wallace, and
Herman Hall suggested on the record in October 2013 that Plaintiff Gary
Anderson had died. NQ 13. More than ninety days have passed since that
filing, and no one has been substituted to prosecute this lawsuit. Helena
Regional Medical Center now moves to dismiss Anderson's claims. NQ 29.
Plaintiffs haven't responded, and seem to agree that Anderson's claims
should be dismissed without prejudice. NQ 28. The obituary attached to the
suggestion shows that there are heirs at law. NQ 13 at 3. The record is not
clear that Anderson's heirs, or the personal representative of his estate, have
been served with the suggestion of death. Rule 25, therefore, does not require
dismissal of his claims. Atkins v. City of Chicago, 547 F.3d 869, 873 (7th Cir.
2008) (Posner, J.); Inglis v. Buena Vista University, 235 F. Supp. 2d 1009, 1029
(N.D. Iowa 2002). Until interested non-parties are served with the suggestion,
FED. R. CIV. P. 25(a)(3), the ninety-day clock does not start. Motion to dismiss,
NQ 29, denied without prejudice.
2. Motion to Sever. Mindful that all claims against Helena Regional
Medical Center are made by Anderson, NQ 6 at ,-r,-r 7-10, the Court also denies
the motion to sever, NQ 26, without prejudice until the status of Anderson's
claims in this lawsuit can be resolved.
3. Motion for default judgment. Motion for default judgment, NQ 18,
granted. Plaintiffs properly served Defendant Acosta on 24 August 2013.
NQ 21. Acosta has failed to answer or respond. FED. R. CIV. P. 55(a). The
Court therefore directs the Clerk to enter a default against Acosta. His
liability to all Plaintiffs (except Anderson) on their Fourth, Eighth, and
Fourteenth Amendment claims, their assault and battery claims, and their
outrage claims is now decided as a matter of law. Damages will be fixed at
the trial. If Anderson's claims are revived by substitution, the Court will
address the default as to him.
Claims Against Woodward.
The Court notes that Howard
Woodward hasn't been properly served, and the 120-day window to do so
has passed. The Court therefore dismisses the claims against Woodward
R. CIV. P. 4(m).
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?