Covington v. Wallace

Filing 97

JUDGMENT: All of Anderson's claims are dismissed with prejudice; Covington's and the Walkers' claims against Woodward are dismissed without prejudice; Covington's and the Walkers' claims against Hall and Travis Wallace are di smissed with prejudice; Covington's and the Walkers' claims against Ules Wallace are dismissed with prejudice; and Covington's and the Walkers' claims against Acosta are dismissed with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the Acosta settlement until 11 September 2015. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/13/2015. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
GARY COVINGTON; BETHANY WALKER;
GARY ANDERSON; BELINDA WALKER;
and JAMES WALKER

PLAINTIFFS

No. 2:13-cv-84-DPM

v.

ULESS WALLACE, Individually and in
his Official Capacity; DALE ACOSTA, Individually
and in his Official Capacity; TRAVIS WALLACE,
Individually and in his Official Capacity; HERMAN
HALL, Individually and in his Official Capacity;
HOWARD WOODWARD, Individually and in
his Official Capacity; and HELENA REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
1. All of Anderson's claims are dismissed with prejudice.
2. Covington's and the Walkers' claims against Woodward are
dismissed without prejudice.
3. Covington's and theW alkers' claims against Hall and Travis Wallace
are dismissed with prejudice.
4. Covington's and the Walkers' claims against Uless Wallace are
dismissed with prejudice.
5. Covington's and the Walkers' claims against Acosta are dismissed

with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the Acosta settlement
untilll September 2015.

v

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge

-2-