Anderson et al v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 149

JUDGMENT entered in favor of Cleo Anderson and Dotty Anderson in the amount of $68,911.93 plus $8,269.43 (which represents 12% damages upon the amount of the loss) plus post-judgment interest to accrue at the rate of 0.25% per annum from the date of the entry of this Judgment until the date the Judgment is satisfied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 03/19/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION CLEO ANDERSON; and DOTTY ANDERSON v. PLAINTIFFS No. 2:13CV00087 JLH SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; and US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT On the 16th day of March, 2015, this action came before the Court for trial by jury. Cleo Anderson and Dotty Anderson appeared in person and with their lawyers, David A. Hodges and Louis A. Etoch. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company appeared through its corporate representative, Sonya Foust, and its lawyers, John E. Moore and William Cody Kees. The plaintiffs and the defendant announced that they were ready for trial, and a jury of twelve was duly selected and sworn. After all of the evidence had been received, the parties stipulated that the cost of repairing the structure was $56,221.93. Thereafter, the jury was instructed on the law and returned verdicts finding in favor of the plaintiffs on all issues and finding that the amount of damages to personal property was $12,690.00. Judgment is therefore entered in favor of Cleo Anderson and Dotty Anderson in the amount of $68,911.93 plus $8,269.43 (which represents 12% damages upon the amount of the loss pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. ยง 23-79-208) plus post-judgment interest to accrue at the rate of 0.25% per annum from the date of the entry of this Judgment until the date the Judgment is satisfied. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of March, 2015. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?