Stiger v. USA

Filing 32

ORDER directing the Plaintiff to file a Reply to the Defendant's 31 Response, within 10 days of the date of this Order, including the reason(s) for the delay in filing the Summary Judgment Response. Failure to timely file this Reply shall result in the denial of the Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/12/2014. (mmd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
THOMAS HAROLD STIGER
v.

PLAINTIFF
2:13CV00110-JTK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEFENDANT
ORDER

By Order dated January 29, 2014, this Court indicated that Plaintiff’s Response to
Defendant’s Summary Judgment Motion (Doc. No. 26) would be construed as a Motion for
Reconsideration (Doc. No. 30). Defendants have now filed a Response to the Motion (Doc. No. 31),
in accordance with the January 29, 2014 Order. Plaintiff is hereby directed to file a Reply to the
Defendant’s Response, within ten days of the date of this Order, including the reason(s) for the delay
in filing the Summary Judgment Response. Failure to timely file this Reply shall result in the denial
of the Motion for Reconsideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of February, 2014.

______________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE