Newton v. Mixon et al
ORDER granting in part 29 motion to strike motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket Mr. Newton's 28 motion as a response to Defendants' 23 motion for summary judgment. The Defendants are not required to reply to Mr. Newton's response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 07/14/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CASE NO. 2:13CV00116 JLH/BD
ANGELA MIXON and CORIZON
The Defendants have moved to strike Mr. Newton’s summary judgment motion
from the record. (Docket entry #29) They argue that Mr. Newton’s motion is untimely,
that he failed to timely respond to their summary judgment motion, and that they should
not be required to respond to Mr. Newton’s motion. The motion (#29) is GRANTED, in
part. The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket Mr. Newton’s motion as a response to
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The Defendants are not required to reply to
Mr. Newton’s response.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of July, 2014.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?