Moss v. Corizon CMS et al
Filing
78
ORDER ADOPTING AS SUPPLEMENTED 63 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. All claims against defendant Young are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/18/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
JOHN T. MOSS,
ADC #79311
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 2:13-cv-117-DPM-HDY
CORIZON INC.; RICK HALLWORTH, Corizon;
KEVIN BILE, Corizon; J.M. COURTNEY, Corizon;
JACK DAVIDSON, Doctor, Corizon; PEARSON,
Doctor, Corizon; OJIUGO IKO, Doctor, Corizon;
ROLAND ANDERSON, Doctor, Corizon;
JENNIFER MCBRIDE, Corizon; CONNIE
HUBBARD, Nurse, Corizon; JOE ANN BURNETT,
Nurse, Corizon; LARRY MAY, ADC; WENDY
KELLY, ADC; GRANT HARRIS, ADC; JIMMY
BANKS, ADC; DARYL GOLDEN, ADC; YOLANDA
CLARK, Captain, ADC; BRADLEY, Lieutenant, ADC;
BARROW, Lieutenant, ADC; DONALD TATE,
Sergeant, ADC; YOUNG, Sergeant, ADC; MADDEN,
Sergeant, ADC; C. JONES, Sergeant, ADC; DARYL
GARDNER, Sergeant, ADC; THOMPSON, Sergeant,
ADC; TURNER, Correctional Officer, ADC;
RAYFORD, Correctional Officer, ADC; POWELL,
Correctional Officer, ADC; KNIGHT, Correctional
Officer, ADC; S. HUDSON, Correctional Officer,
ADC; K. AUSTON, Correctional Officer, ADC;
BRANDI HUDGENS, Correctional Officer, ADC;
MOTON, Correctional Officer, ADC;
CHRISTOPHER SHORTER, Correctional Officer,
ADC; TELICIA DOBBS, Correctional Officer, ADC;
LOUIS, Correctional Officer, ADC; and SHABAZE,
Correctional Officer, ADC
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Unopposed recommendation, Ng 63, adopted as supplemented. FED. R.
CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). While Sergeant
Young perhaps could be identified eventually, Moss has pleaded only a
conclusion about what Young supposedly did, Ng 2 at 57, 60, & 61, unlike the
specific allegations about many others. Compare Munz v. Parr, 758 F.2d 1254,
1257 (8th Cir. 1985). All claims against Young are therefore dismissed
without prejudice.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?