McAlphin v. Obi et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 7 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice claims for damages against Defendants in their official capacities; and dismissing without prejudice claims against Kitrell, Delk, Gardner, D' Anna, Corizon, Dunn, Anderson, and May for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/04/2013. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION JAMES MCALPHIN, ADC # 88328 v. PLAINTIFF No. 2:13-cv-145-DPM-JJV N. OBI, Doctor, ADC, EARU; BALL, Doctor, ADC, EARU; G. CAMPBELL, APN, ADC, EARU; KITRELL, Doctor, Psychiatrist, ADC, EARU; JOHN DELK, Doctor of Urology, University Hospital; CHARLOTTE GARDNER, Regional Ombudsman; RICHARD E. D'ANNA, Urologist; CORIZON, Medical Contractor, ADC; DUNN, Nurse; ROLAND ANDERSON, Doctor, ADC Central Office; and LARRY MAY, Assistant Director, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's proposed findings and recommendations, NQ 7. McAlphin has not objected. After reviewing the proposal for clear factual error and for legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes), the Court adopts it. McAlphin' s claim for damages against Defendants in their official capacities is dismissed without prejudice. McAlphin' s claims against Kitrell, Delk, Gardner, D' Anna, Corizon, Dunn, Anderson, and May are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?