McAlphin v. Obi et al
ORDER adopting 7 proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing without prejudice claims for damages against Defendants in their official capacities; and dismissing without prejudice claims against Kitrell, Delk, Gardner, D' Anna, Corizon, Dunn, Anderson, and May for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/04/2013. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
ADC # 88328
N. OBI, Doctor, ADC, EARU; BALL,
Doctor, ADC, EARU; G. CAMPBELL,
APN, ADC, EARU; KITRELL, Doctor,
Psychiatrist, ADC, EARU; JOHN DELK,
Doctor of Urology, University Hospital;
CHARLOTTE GARDNER, Regional
Ombudsman; RICHARD E. D'ANNA,
Urologist; CORIZON, Medical Contractor,
ADC; DUNN, Nurse; ROLAND ANDERSON,
Doctor, ADC Central Office; and LARRY
MAY, Assistant Director, ADC
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's proposed
findings and recommendations, NQ 7. McAlphin has not objected. After
reviewing the proposal for clear factual error and for legal error,
P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes), the Court adopts it.
McAlphin' s claim for damages against Defendants in their official capacities
is dismissed without prejudice. McAlphin' s claims against Kitrell, Delk,
Gardner, D' Anna, Corizon, Dunn, Anderson, and May are dismissed without
prejudice for failure to state a claim.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?