McAlphin v. Obi et al
Filing
82
JUDGMENT: McAlphin's official capacity claims are dismissed without prejudice; McAlphin's claims against Kitrell, Delk, Gardener, D'Anna, Corizon, Dunn, Anderson, May, Hobbs, Kelly, and Ball are dismissed without prejudice; McAlphin 39;s heat exposure claims against Obi-Okoye are dismissed without prejudice; McAlphin's claims against the ADC are dismissed with prejudice; and all other claims against Obi-Okoye and Campbell are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 04/21/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
JAMES McALPHIN
ADC # 88328
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 2:13-cv-145-DPM
DR. NWANNEM OBI-OKOYE, ADC, EARU;
DR. DON BALL, ADC, EARU; GERALDINE
CAMPBELL, APN, ADC, EARU; DR. KITRELL,
Psychiatrist, ADC, EARU; DR. JOHN DELK,
Doctor of Urology, University Hospital;
CHARLOTTE GARDNER, Regional Ombudsman;
DR. RICHARD E. D' ANNA, Urologist; CORIZON,
Medical Contractor, ADC; DUNN, Nurse; DR.
ROLAND ANDERSON, ADC Central Office;
LARRY MAY, Assistant Director, ADC; RAY
HOBBS, Director, ADC, in his individual capacity;
WENDY KELLY, Deputy Assistant Director,
ADC, in her individual capacity; and ARKANSAS
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, a municipality
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
1. McAlphin' s official capacity claims are dismissed without prejudice.
2. McAlphin' s claims against Kitrell, Delk, Gardener, D' Anna, Corizon,
Dunn, Anderson, May, Hobbs, Kelly, and Ball are dismissed without
prejudice.
3. McAlphin' s heat exposure claims against Obi-Okoye are dismissed
without prejudice.
4. McAlphin' s claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction
are dismissed with prejudice.
5. All other claims against Obi-Okoye and Campbell are dismissed with
prejudice.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
?..1
-2-
4gWJ
J-.o,~
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?