Tatum v. Mitchell et al

Filing 155

ORDER dismissing without prejudice Tatum's claims against Mitchell and Brooks. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/20/2015. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION

ANTWAN TATUM

v.

PLAINTIFF
2:13-cv-151-DPM-JTR

MITCHELL, Sergeant, EARU, ADC;
BRYANT PHILLIPS, Officer, EARU,
ADC; BROOKS, Lieutenant, EARU,
ADC; and MICHAEL T. HUMPHREY,
Shift Supervisor, EARU, ADC

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Despite numerous efforts by the Court and Tatum, service has not been
obtained on Mitchell and Brooks. N2 9, 11, 17, 19, 67, 69, 150, & 154. The time
for doing so has long since expired.

FED.

R. CIV. P. 4(m). Tatum's claims

against Mitchell and Brooks are therefore dismissed without prejudice.
So Ordered.