Tatum v. Mitchell et al

Filing 155

ORDER dismissing without prejudice Tatum's claims against Mitchell and Brooks. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/20/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION ANTWAN TATUM v. PLAINTIFF 2:13-cv-151-DPM-JTR MITCHELL, Sergeant, EARU, ADC; BRYANT PHILLIPS, Officer, EARU, ADC; BROOKS, Lieutenant, EARU, ADC; and MICHAEL T. HUMPHREY, Shift Supervisor, EARU, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER Despite numerous efforts by the Court and Tatum, service has not been obtained on Mitchell and Brooks. N2 9, 11, 17, 19, 67, 69, 150, & 154. The time for doing so has long since expired. FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m). Tatum's claims against Mitchell and Brooks are therefore dismissed without prejudice. So Ordered.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?