Tatum v. Mitchell et al
ORDER dismissing without prejudice Tatum's claims against Mitchell and Brooks. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/20/2015. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
MITCHELL, Sergeant, EARU, ADC;
BRYANT PHILLIPS, Officer, EARU,
ADC; BROOKS, Lieutenant, EARU,
ADC; and MICHAEL T. HUMPHREY,
Shift Supervisor, EARU, ADC
Despite numerous efforts by the Court and Tatum, service has not been
obtained on Mitchell and Brooks. N2 9, 11, 17, 19, 67, 69, 150, & 154. The time
for doing so has long since expired.
R. CIV. P. 4(m). Tatum's claims
against Mitchell and Brooks are therefore dismissed without prejudice.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?