Haley v. Haynes et al
Filing
64
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects and dismissing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 08/14/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
SAMUEL E. HALEY,
REG #05508-045
v.
PETITIONER
Case No: 2:13-cv-00153 KGB
ANTHONY HAYNES, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 43). Plaintiff Samuel E. Haley has objected to
the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 55). He has also filed several related
motions, notices, and objections (Dkt. Nos. 49–54, 56–61, 63). After careful review of the
Proposed Findings and Recommendations and the objections thereto, as well as a de novo review
of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be,
and are hereby, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects
(Dkt. No. 43).
Mr. Haley has also filed notice that he intends to sue the defendants for various alleged
violations of his constitutional and statutory rights. That case or controversy is not currently
before this Court, and this Court cannot therefore make a determination on any future suit Mr.
Haley may file or potential claims he may bring.
Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice, and all pending motions are denied
as moot.
SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2014.
____________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?