Woodley v. Nwanne et al

Filing 43

ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety in all respects 40 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting defendants' 32 motion for summary judgment; dismissing Mr. Woodley's 2 complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/28/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM LEE WOODLEY ADC #67148 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:14-cv-00012 KGB NWANNEM OBI-OKOYE et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 40), and the objections filed by plaintiff William Lee Woodley (Dkt. Nos. 41, 42). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that: 1. The Court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 32) and dismisses with prejudice Mr. Woodley’s complaint. 2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. SO ORDERED this 28th day of May, 2015. KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?