Woodley v. Nwanne et al
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety in all respects 40 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting defendants' 32 motion for summary judgment; dismissing Mr. Woodley's 2 complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/28/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WILLIAM LEE WOODLEY
Case No. 2:14-cv-00012 KGB
NWANNEM OBI-OKOYE et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 40), and the objections filed by plaintiff William
Lee Woodley (Dkt. Nos. 41, 42). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo
review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s
findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
The Court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 32) and
dismisses with prejudice Mr. Woodley’s complaint.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and
Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 28th day of May, 2015.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?