Strange v. USA et al
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety and in all respects. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice due to his failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/15/2014. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
CALVIN D. STRANGE, JR.
REG #20832-075
v.
PLAINTIFF
2:14CV00078 BSM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Ray have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended
disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety and in all
respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.
Plaintiff’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed without prejudice due to his
failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
2.
It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 15th day of October 2014.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?