Ellis v. Haynes
ORDER finding that service is appropriate for the Defendant Anthony Haynes; directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for the Defendant; and directing the US Marshall to serve a copy of the 2 Complaint and summons on Defendant Haynes, the US Attorney and the US Attorney General without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 10/28/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Plaintiff is a federal inmate incarcerated at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center. He filed
this action, pro se, against Defendant Anthony Haynes, alleging a violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) (Doc. No. 2.) By Order dated July 29, 2014, this Court granted Plaintiff’s
Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis in this action, and provided him the opportunity to submit an
Amended Complaint to clarify whether he also intended to file a federal civil rights action and
whether he intended to name additional individuals as Defendants (Doc. No. 3). Pursuant to
Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time, the Court on August 13, 2014, granted him an additional
sixty days to submit the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 5). As of this date, Plaintiff has not
submitted an Amended Complaint.
Therefore, the Court will direct the issuance of summons and service of Plaintiff’s Complaint
on Defendant Haynes with respect to Plaintiff’s ADA claim.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that service is appropriate for the Defendant Anthony
Haynes. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare summons for the Defendant and the United States
Marshal shall serve a copy of the Complaint (Doc. No. 2) and summons on Defendant Haynes, the
United States Attorney for this district, and the United States Attorney General, without prepayment
of fees and costs or security therefore.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October, 2014.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?