Knox v. Social Security Administration
Filing
19
ORDER approving and adopting in all respects 18 recommended disposition. The commissioner's decision is reversed and this case is remanded for the ALJ to obtain additional vocational evidence and resolve the conflict between plaintiff's r eaching limitations and the reaching requirements for cashier II. Vocational evidence may be obtained through hearing testimony or written interrogatories of a vocational expert. Using such evidence, the ALJ should reconsider whether work exists that plaintiff can do. The clerk is directed to immediately remand this case to the ALJ along with a copy of the RD. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/30/2015. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
JOHN AARON KNOX
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 2:14CV00100 BSM
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner,
Social Security Administration
DEFENDANT
ORDER
The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Beth Deere has been reviewed. No objection has been filed. After careful consideration, the
RD is hereby approved and adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1
The commissioner’s decision is reversed and this case is remanded for the ALJ
to obtain additional vocational evidence and resolve the conflict between plaintiff’s reaching
limitations and the reaching requirements for cashier II. Vocational evidence may be
obtained through hearing testimony or written interrogatories of a vocational expert. Using
such evidence, the ALJ should reconsider whether work exists that plaintiff can do.
2
The clerk is directed to immediately remand this case to the ALJ along with
a copy of the RD.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of June 2015.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?