Hickman v. Butler et al
Filing
21
Order approving and adopting 12 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects and granting defendant Dr. Brett Butler's 6 motion to dismiss. Because the Recommendations did not directly address arguments advanced by Ms. Petty, Mr. Hickman's claims against Ms. Petty remain pending. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 08/12/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
TONY A. HICKMAN
VS.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 2:14-cv-00131 KGB/PSH
BRETT BUTLER, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The
Court
has
reviewed
the
Proposed
Findings
and
Recommendations
(“Recommendations”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No.
12) and the timely objections filed by plaintiff Tony Hickman (Dkt. No. 14). After careful
consideration of the Recommendations and Mr. Hickman’s objections, as well as a de novo
review of the record, the Court approves and adopts the Recommendations in their entirety as
this Court’s findings in all respects.
Therefore, the Court grants defendant Dr. Brett Butler’s
motion to dismiss and dismisses with prejudice Mr. Hickman’s claims against Dr. Butler.
At the time the Recommendations were submitted, the second defendant now identified
as Jennifer Petty had not been served with Mr. Hickman’s complaint. Ms. Petty has now been
served, and she has filed an answer (Dkt. Nos. 17, 19). Because the Recommendations did not
directly address arguments advanced by Ms. Petty, Mr. Hickman’s claims against Ms. Petty
remain pending.
SO ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2015.
_______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?