Hickman v. Butler et al

Filing 21

Order approving and adopting 12 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects and granting defendant Dr. Brett Butler's 6 motion to dismiss. Because the Recommendations did not directly address arguments advanced by Ms. Petty, Mr. Hickman's claims against Ms. Petty remain pending. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 08/12/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION TONY A. HICKMAN VS. PLAINTIFF Case No. 2:14-cv-00131 KGB/PSH BRETT BUTLER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (“Recommendations”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 12) and the timely objections filed by plaintiff Tony Hickman (Dkt. No. 14). After careful consideration of the Recommendations and Mr. Hickman’s objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court approves and adopts the Recommendations in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Therefore, the Court grants defendant Dr. Brett Butler’s motion to dismiss and dismisses with prejudice Mr. Hickman’s claims against Dr. Butler. At the time the Recommendations were submitted, the second defendant now identified as Jennifer Petty had not been served with Mr. Hickman’s complaint. Ms. Petty has now been served, and she has filed an answer (Dkt. Nos. 17, 19). Because the Recommendations did not directly address arguments advanced by Ms. Petty, Mr. Hickman’s claims against Ms. Petty remain pending. SO ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2015. _______________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?