Ratliff v. Burl et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/27/2015. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
NORTHERN DIVISION
BRADLEE RATLIFF,
ADC #128371
v.

PLAINTIFF
2:14CV00133-JM-JTK

DANNY BURL, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted.
2.

This dismissal constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the PLRA.

3.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment

dismissing this action would not be in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of January, 2015.

______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE