Jones v. Burl et al
Filing
65
ORDER adopting 64 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 60 motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he is first required to reimburse Defendants $ ;190.75 for the court reporter's fees they incurred on July 8, 2015. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/28/2015. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
JOSHUA JONES,
ADC# 658234
v.
PLAINTIFF
2:14CV00136-JM-JJV
DANNY BURL, Warden,
East Arkansas Regional Unit: et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. No. 60) is GRANTED.
2.
If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he is first required to reimburse
Defendants $190.75 for the court reporter’s fees they incurred on July 8, 2015.
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 28th day of August, 2015.
_______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?