Jones v. Burl et al

Filing 65

ORDER adopting 64 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 60 motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he is first required to reimburse Defendants $ ;190.75 for the court reporter's fees they incurred on July 8, 2015. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/28/2015. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION JOSHUA JONES, ADC# 658234 v. PLAINTIFF 2:14CV00136-JM-JJV DANNY BURL, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit: et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. No. 60) is GRANTED. 2. If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he is first required to reimburse Defendants $190.75 for the court reporter’s fees they incurred on July 8, 2015. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 28th day of August, 2015. _______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?