Walker v. Burls

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 8 the partial recommended disposition; allowing Plaintiff's equal protection claim to proceed and dismissing his due process claim; directing the clerk to prepare a summons for Burls; directing the USMS to serve the summons, complaint and this order on Burls; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/15/2015. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION ANTHONY DEWAYNE WALKER, ADC #107683 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 2:15CV00021 BSM DANNY BURLS, Warden, Tucker Maximum Security Unit, ADC DEFENDANT ORDER The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and plaintiff’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After a careful consideration of these documents, and a de novo review of the record, the PRD is hereby approved and adopted in its entirety in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED THAT: 1 Plaintiff’s equal protection claim is allowed to proceed and his due process claim is dismissed with prejudice; 2 The clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Burls, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint, and this order on Burls through the ADC compliance division without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor (if Burls is no longer an ADC employee, the ADC compliance division must file, with the return of unexecuted service, a SEALED statement providing his last known private mailing address); and 3 It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of May 2015. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?