Stokes et al v. Smith et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 13 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition. Plaintiffs James Huffins and Carl Lee Ward are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to submit the statutory filing fee; Defendant J R Smith is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff Stokes' failure to state any viable claim against him. The Court certifies that an in form pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/11/2015. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
WILLIAM STOKES,
ADC # 152752; et al.
v.

PLAINTIFFS

2:15CV00086-JM-JJV

J. R. SMITH, Sheriff,
Cross County Jail; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended
Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings
in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiffs James Huffins and Carl Lee Ward are DISMISSED without prejudice for

failure to submit the statutory filing fee.
2.

Defendant J. R. Smith is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff Stokes’

failure to state any viable claim against him.
3.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 11th day of August, 2015.

_______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE