Coffey v. Kelly et al

Filing 61

ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety the 59 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting the 39 motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendants CCS, Stieve, Flos s, Butler, and Kimble; and granting the 42 motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendants Kelley and Griffin. Coffey's claims against Stieve and Kimble are dismissed without prejudice, and any claims against CCS, Floss, and Butler, o ther than the exhausted claims identified in the recommendation, are dismissed without prejudice. Coffey's claims against Kelley are dismissed without prejudice, and any claims against Griffin, other than the exhausted claims identified in the recommendation, are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/3/2017. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HELENA DIVISION
KENNY COFFEY, ADC #86434
v.

PLAINTIFF
NO. 2:15CV00157 JLH/PSH

WENDY KELLEY, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

The motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendants CCS, Stieve, Floss,

Butler, and Kimble (Doc. No. 39), is GRANTED; Coffey’s claims against Stieve and Kimble are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and any claims against CCS, Floss, and Butler, other than
the exhausted claims identified in the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, (Doc. No. 59) are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2.

The motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendants Kelley and Griffin

(Doc. No. 42) is GRANTED; Coffey’s claims against Kelley are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE; and any claims against Griffin, other than the exhausted claims identified in the
Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DATED this 3rd day of February, 2017.
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE