Stilley v. USA et al

Filing 93

ORDER adopting in its entirety 82 the recommended disposition; granting the government's 51 motion for summary judgment, and dismissing this case, with prejudice; denying as moot 75 86 plaintiff's motions to compel, 87 to disqualify, and 88 to stay. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/16/2018. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION OSCAR STILLEY Reg. # 10579-062 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00163 BSM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 82] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere has been reviewed. The parties have not submitted objections per se, but plaintiff Oscar Stilley has submitted motions to compel, to disqualify, and to stay [Doc. Nos. 86, 87, 88]. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety, the government’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 51] is granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. Stilley asserts he needs access to certain discovery materials in various formats and that he needs more time to respond to the recommended disposition due to his being transferred and due to his hunger striking and placement in a special housing unit and in administrative segregation. See Doc. No. 75; Doc. No. 88. For the reasons explained in the recommended disposition, his motions to compel [Doc. Nos. 75, 86], to disqualify [Doc. No. 87], and to stay [Doc. No. 88] are denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of February 2018. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?