Manley v. DeVazier

Filing 32

ORDER denying without prejudice as moot 27 Motion for injunctive relief based on the parties' agreement on dealing with the IRS. 26 Motion to amend granted with a caveat: Mr. Autry must redact any personal confidential information from each line of each page of any exhibit. Clean copy of amended complaint with revised exhibit due by 5/17/2017. The Court seals 26 -3 because it contains personal confidential information. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/10/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION SHAWN DeVAZIER MANLEY, In Her Capacities as Executrix of the Estate of Donna A. DeV azier and as Beneficiary of the Donna A. DeV azier Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust No. 1 Dated December 29, 2003 v. No. 2:15-cv-164-DPM THOMAS BRADLEY DeVAZIER, Individually, and as Trustee of the Donna A. Devazier Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust No. 1 Dated December 29, 2003 SHAWN DeVAZIER MANLEY, In Her Capacity as Executrix of the Estate of Donna A. DeV azier v. PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF/ COUNTER DEFENDANT No. 2:15-cv-165-DPM THOMAS BRADLEY DeV AZIER, Individually, as successor Administrator of the Estate of Thomas B. DeV azier and as Trustee of the Thomas B. DeV azier Marital Deduction Trust Established December 29, 2003 DEFENDANT/ COUNTER CLAIMANT ORDER Motion for injunctive relief, Ng 27, denied without prejudice as moot based on the parties' agreement on dealing with the IRS. Unopposed motion to amend, NQ 26, granted with a caveat: Mr. Autry must redact any personal confidential information from each line of each page of any exhibit. Clean copy of amended complaint with revised exhibit due by 17 May 2017. The Court seals NQ 26-3 because it contains personal confidential information. So Ordered. ZI D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 10 -2- wt°7 J.o t 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?