Manley v. DeVazier
Filing
49
ORDER: For the reasons stated on the record at the end of the 7/5/2017 hearing, the Court made the following rulings. 37 Motion for Summary Judgment on Brad DeVazier's answer and counterclaim is granted. Counts 1 & 2 of the amended complaint w ill be dismissed without prejudice as moot. Shawn's 39 Motion for partial summary judgment on Count 3 of the amended complaint is granted. Each side's request for attorney's fees is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/7/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
SHAWN DeV AZIER MANLEY, In Her Capacities
as Executrix of the Estate of Donna A. DeV azier
and as Beneficiary of the Donna A. De V azier
Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust No. 1
Dated December 29, 2003
PLAINTIFF/
COUNTER DEFENDANT
v.
No. 2:15-cv-164-DPM
THOMAS BRADLEY DeV AZIER,
Individually, and as Trustee of the Donna A.
DeVazier Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust No. 1
Dated December 29, 2003
SHAWN DeV AZIER MANLEY, In Her
Capacity as Executrix of the Estate of
Donna A. De V azier
v.
DEFENDANT/
COUNTER CLAIMANT
PLAINTIFF/
COUNTER DEFENDANT
No. 2:15-cv-165-DPM
THOMAS BRADLEY De V AZIER, Individually,
as successor Administrator of the Estate of
Thomas B. DeV azier and as Trustee of the
Thomas B. De V azier Marital Deduction Trust
Established December 29, 2003
DEFENDANT/
COUNTER CLAIMANT
ORDER
For the reasons stated on the record at the end of the 5 July 2017
hearing, the Court made the following rulings:
• Brad DeVazier' s motion for summary judgment on his answer and
counterclaim, Ng 3 7, is granted.
• Counts 1 & 2 of the amended complaint will be dismissed without
prejudice as moot.
• Shawn's motion for partial summary judgment, on Count 3 of the
amended complaint, Ng 39, is granted.
• Each side's request for attorney's fees is denied.
So Ordered.
{/
D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?