Manley v. DeVazier

Filing 6

ORDER: Pursuant to General Order 54, the Court authorizes Edward Autry tobring a cell phone, laptop computer, or personal digital assistant into theRichard Sheppard Arnold United States Courthouse in Little Rock on 4/7/2017 for the hearing in this case. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/7/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION SHAWN DeVAZIER MANLEY, In Her Capacities as Executrix of the Estate of Donna A. DeVazier and as Beneficiary of the Donna A. DeVazier Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust No. 1 Dated December 29, 2003 v. No. 2:15-cv-164-DPM THOMAS BRADLEY DeVAZIER, Individually, and as Trustee of the Donna A. DeVazier Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust No. 1 Dated December 29, 2003 SHAWN DeVAZIER MANLEY, In Her Capacity as Executrix of the Estate of Donna A. DeVazier v. PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF/ COUNTER DEFENDANT No. 2:15-cv-165-DPM THOMAS BRADLEY DeVAZIER, Individually, as successor Administrator of the Estate of Thomas B. DeVazier and as Trustee of the Thomas B. DeVazier Marital Deduction Trust Established December 29, 2003 DEFENDANT/ COUNTER CLAIMANT ORDER Pursuant to General Order 54, the Court authorizes Edward Autry to bring a cell phone, laptop computer, or personal digital assistant into the Richard Sheppard Arnold United States Courthouse in Little Rock on 7 April 2017 for the hearing in this case. The following rules apply to this access: • The devices mentioned may not be used to record, photograph, or film anyone or anything inside the courthouse. • Cell phones and PDAs must be turned off and put away when in the courtroom. • Wireless internet components of all electronic devices must be deactivated when in the courtroom. • Only counsel, and support staff at counsel table, may use laptops in the courtroom. • Before persons with electronic devices are granted entry into the courthouse, all devices must be examined by the United States Marshals Service or Court Security Personnel. This examination includes, but is not limited to, placing the device through the electronic screening machines and requiring the person possessing the device to turn the power to the device off and on. • The United States Marshals Service may further restrict electronic devices from entering the building if a threat so requires. A violation of these rules may result in seizure of the electronic devices, withdrawal of the privilege to bring an electronic device into the courthouse, or other sanctions. A violation of the prohibition on recording, photographing, or filming anyone or anything inside the courthouse may be punished as contempt of court. -2- So Ordered. ________________________ D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 7 April 2017 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?