Manley v. DeVazier
Filing
6
ORDER: Pursuant to General Order 54, the Court authorizes Edward Autry tobring a cell phone, laptop computer, or personal digital assistant into theRichard Sheppard Arnold United States Courthouse in Little Rock on 4/7/2017 for the hearing in this case. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/7/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
EASTERN DIVISION
SHAWN DeVAZIER MANLEY, In Her Capacities
as Executrix of the Estate of Donna A. DeVazier
and as Beneficiary of the Donna A. DeVazier
Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust No. 1
Dated December 29, 2003
v.
No. 2:15-cv-164-DPM
THOMAS BRADLEY DeVAZIER,
Individually, and as Trustee of the Donna A.
DeVazier Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust No. 1
Dated December 29, 2003
SHAWN DeVAZIER MANLEY, In Her
Capacity as Executrix of the Estate of
Donna A. DeVazier
v.
PLAINTIFF
DEFENDANT
PLAINTIFF/
COUNTER DEFENDANT
No. 2:15-cv-165-DPM
THOMAS BRADLEY DeVAZIER,
Individually, as successor Administrator of
the Estate of Thomas B. DeVazier and as
Trustee of the Thomas B. DeVazier
Marital Deduction Trust Established
December 29, 2003
DEFENDANT/
COUNTER CLAIMANT
ORDER
Pursuant to General Order 54, the Court authorizes Edward Autry to
bring a cell phone, laptop computer, or personal digital assistant into the
Richard Sheppard Arnold United States Courthouse in Little Rock on 7 April
2017 for the hearing in this case.
The following rules apply to this access:
•
The devices mentioned may not be used to record, photograph,
or film anyone or anything inside the courthouse.
•
Cell phones and PDAs must be turned off and put away when in
the courtroom.
•
Wireless internet components of all electronic devices must be
deactivated when in the courtroom.
•
Only counsel, and support staff at counsel table, may use laptops
in the courtroom.
•
Before persons with electronic devices are granted entry into the
courthouse, all devices must be examined by the United States
Marshals Service or Court Security Personnel. This examination
includes, but is not limited to, placing the device through the
electronic screening machines and requiring the person
possessing the device to turn the power to the device off and on.
•
The United States Marshals Service may further restrict electronic
devices from entering the building if a threat so requires.
A violation of these rules may result in seizure of the electronic devices,
withdrawal of the privilege to bring an electronic device into the courthouse,
or other sanctions.
A violation of the prohibition on recording,
photographing, or filming anyone or anything inside the courthouse may be
punished as contempt of court.
-2-
So Ordered.
________________________
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
7 April 2017
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?