Taylor et al v. Kelly et al
ORDER adopting 72 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; granting Defendants' 58 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing Defendants Bailey, Kelley, Reed, and Earl from this action without prejudice; dismissing Plaintiff Robinson's claims against Defendants Lay, Burnett, and Bray without prejudice; and denying Plaintiffs' 67 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 09/27/2016. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
RICKEY TAYLOR, ADC #110675, and
DE’MARION ROBINSON, ADC #150420
WENDY KELLEY, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 58) is GRANTED.
Defendants Bailey, Kelley, Reed, and Earl are DISMISSED from this action, without
prejudice, for failure to exhaust.
Plaintiff Robinson’s claims against Defendants Lay, Burnett, and Bray are
DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to exhaust.
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 67) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2016.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?