Taylor et al v. Kelly et al

Filing 95

ORDER adopting the 87 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; granting Defendants' 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing with prejudice Plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendants. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/9/2017. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION RICKEY T. TAYLOR, ADC #110675, and DE’MARION D. ROBINSON, ADC #150420 V. PLAINTIFFS 2:15CV00188-JM-JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the timely objections received thereto, and Plaintiffs’ late filed response to the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 78) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of February, 2017. ______________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?