Muldrow v. Bureau of Prisons et al
ORDER adopting 36 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; granting defendant Lam's 26 motion to dismiss, and he is dismissed from plaintiff's complaint; and denying plaintiff's 30 motion to amend. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/25/2016. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DOES, Federal Prison Officials;
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections.1 After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Defendant Lam’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and he is DISMISSED from
plaintiff’s complaint. Document #26.
Plaintiff’s motion to amend is DENIED. Document #30.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of May, 2016.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Lealon Muldrow has responded but does not object. He asks that the United States be
substituted as the proper defendant, but the docket already reflects that the USA is a defendant.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?